On a sun-kissed day that normally would have seen racing at Churchill Downs, the heads of six Kentucky racetracks and the largest thoroughbred horsemen's association gathered in the empty paddock yesterday, pleading for support for the state's signature industry. The fix, they say, is electronic slot machines, which are helping nearby states fatten purses and lure horses from Kentucky.
Earlier this month, Churchill dropped a day of racing each week because of that
horse shortage. The shortened weeks began yesterday. "For a $4 billion industry and 100,000 jobs on the line, the Kentucky legislature has got to step up and find a way to make this work for us and give us a chance to be competitive," Ellis Park owner Ron Geary said.
Louisville native Dale Romans, the third all-time leading trainer at Churchill
Downs, said that, without expanded gaming he would have to consider moving his
base elsewhere to keep the business of owners who want the larger purses of
neighboring states. "I don't think there is a Plan B (if Kentucky doesn't get slots). I don't think there can be," Romans said. "There is just nothing else to do."
The Family Foundation, a conservative anti-gambling group, says gambling
proponents are trying to do an end-run around the state constitution. “The people allow for a change in the constitution, not just Churchill Downs or one lawyer in the Attorney General’s Office,” said David Edmunds of The Family Foundation on recent efforts to bring slot machines to Kentucky without a voter-approved change in the constitution. “We like horses; we just don’t believe that gambling lobbyists should be allowed to use them to trample Kentucky’s constitution,” said Edmunds in response to today’s press conference held at Churchill Downs asking for slot machines to be passed in a special session this summer.
The case for expanded gambling in KY is now being framed as the only way to save the horse industry in KY. What are your thoughts? Are you willing to allow slots and other forms of gambling at state tracks in order to save the industry? Is this was allowed, do you think the “slippery slope” axiom would apply? Would it open the door to further expansion of gambling? What about the Family Foundation’s argument that any attempt to do this outside of a state-wide referendum is unconstitutional?
The identity and economy of the Commonwealth of Kentucky is closely connected to the horse racing industry. I certainly enjoy watching the Kentucky Oaks and the Kentucky Derby - on television. My service as a police chaplain, however, has introduced me to the less glamorous side of all that the Derby Festival and the Derby itself brings into our community.
It is not necessary to chronicle all of the negatives that gambling brings to a community. The impact on individuals, families, and communities can be devastating. Do we want to expand this influence into our community?
I for one, do not. Maybe the horse racing industry will soon go the way of 8 track tapes and beta machines - relics of the past.
The cost of this stimulus to the horse racing industry is too high for persons, families and this community to allow the expansion of gambling.